<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cobzilla &#187; New Standard Tuning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cobzilla.com/category/new-standard-tuning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cobzilla.com</link>
	<description>Official home of the Federal Funk...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Standard Tuning &#8211; Part II &#8211; Intervals</title>
		<link>http://cobzilla.com/2010/04/24/nst-intervals/</link>
		<comments>http://cobzilla.com/2010/04/24/nst-intervals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Standard Tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intervals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert fripp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cobzilla.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music nomenclature sucks. It was invented thousands of years ago and is full of naming conventions as convoluted and archaic as the notion that we should divide standard measures of distance into arbitrary numbers of divisions. Most of the world has moved on to a more stable and sane system of measurement. But as of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cobzilla.com/2010/04/24/nst-intervals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Standard Tuning &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://cobzilla.com/2010/01/21/new-standard-tuning-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://cobzilla.com/2010/01/21/new-standard-tuning-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Standard Tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert fripp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cobzilla.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the quest to break out of my ever present rut. I&#39;ve started experimenting with alternate guitar/bass tunings. My thought is that I generally end up playing through certain fret patterns by habit and instead of doing the work to break those habits, it&#39;s much easier to mess with the tuners so that those same [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://cobzilla.com/2010/01/21/new-standard-tuning-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

